As with all of the Web 2.0 tools we have looked at thus far each one had its own benefits and challenges and wikis certainly fall into this category too!
Benefits:
- collaborative
- fosters writing
- connectivity
- fosters participation
Challenges:
- security
- ability to edit
- access
- reliability
When trying to decide if the use of a wiki is beneficial consider the following: purpose, audience, and pros/cons.
I really like what Andy Carvin said in this article Wikipedia in the Classroom: Consensus Among Educators?
“I explored the possibility of having teachers assigning teams of students to tackle a particular Wikipedia entry and dissect it. Does the entry cite any sources? If so, are they primary sources, secondary sources, other reference materials, blogs, etc? Students would then conduct their own research into the topic, meticulously examining multiple sources in order to reach a consensus. Quoting from my original post:Once the Wikipedia entry has been fact-checked, the teacher creates a Wikipedia login for the class. They go to the entry’s talk page and present their findings, laying out every idea that needs to be corrected. Then, they edit the actual entry to make the corrections, with all sources cited. Similarly, for all the parts of the entry they’ve verified as accurate, they list sources confirming it. That way, each idea presented in the Wikipedia entry has been verified and referenced – hopefully with multiple sources. Get enough classrooms doing this, you kill several birds with one stone: Wikipedia’s information gets better, students help give back to the Net by improving the accuracy of an important online resource, and teachers have a way to make lemons into lemonade, turning Wikipedia from a questionable information source to a powerful tool for information literacy.”